Friday, April 04, 2008

Ars Erotica (Art of Erotic Poetry) and Authorial Intent

Imagine reading this poem from a literary folio published by a Catholic school student publication:

Come, Man-child, Come!

Come, man-child, come!
Come closer, look deeper.
Ignore my inadequate bosom, my enormous hips;
Forget about the torn veil of chastity and its
Promise of orgasmic bliss.
Look at me and see in me the Woman
Who nourished you with her soggy breasts.
Mine are still firm and plump and erect.
Feel them. Suck them like you sucked your Mother's
Back in the days when your universe was just
A Pair of Nipples Overflowing with Maternal Kindness.
Know that I, too, am Masculine:
Provider. Preserver. Protector.
Penetrate me with the force you spend
When you thrust the nail into hardwood
And know that I, too, am
Tough. Strong. Virile.
Go into me deeper, deeper, deeper...
'Til you reach my abyss:
Your Climax; your Peak!
And when you get there don't drift away;
Don't conclude the moment in haste with your clumsy
Ejaculation!
Stay with me and wait for me to Come, too!
Be just.
Be considerate.
Be a Man.
Take time to fathom the depth of the womb
Which molded you and nurtured you
And excites you and delights you
Which you enter and re-enter
And know not yet!

I am a professor at a Catholic school... I wrote this poem about seven years ago to express my feminist sentiments.

Trouble came when the literary staff of the school paper's literary folio deemed this poem worthy of publication and approved its printing and circulation in March 2008. When the folio came out of the press last month, I was admonished by my immediate superior for writing such a "pornographic" piece of filth. Some of my colleagues thought the poem is too sleazy and is reflective of the author's moral state.

I remember a poet from Brooklyn named Walt Whitman, whose poems were considered trash. I remember e.e. cummings' "she being brand" and "i love my body when it is with your." I remember the Song of Songs, the Holy Book's contribution to erotica. I remember the summer of 2002, when I was chosen as one of the ten aspiring writers/poets from all over the country to represent my home city at a national creative writing workshop. This "condemned piece of filth" was my ticket to this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. This was, and still is, one of my most well-written poems.

Palanca award-winning novelist, Mr. Vince Groyon called this poem "a song of complaint" of misunderstood women who are being "used" as sex objects. Eurasian author of the novel Crocodile Fury, Elizabeth Yahp said that she would never change a word in it, as it already sounds perfect to her. Professor and poet Dr. Marjorie Evasco of De La Salle University finds this poem's diction artistically provocative when she registered that the line, "A Pair of Nipples Overflowing with Maternal Kindness" tickled her pink.

National Artist and multi-awarded poet/writer Dr. Cirilo F. Bautista calls poetry a "linguistic daring." In other words, the poet must dare explore the power of words and must harness this power to deliver his/her social commentary and express his/her observations of life in the real world, as well as to effect change.

I do not write poetry to describe the beautiful world, with all its birds and flowers and bees. I do not write poetry to sugar-coat realities. I write poetry to describe what traditional poets (who love to rhyme) would rather ignore. I write poetry to unmask the real world, where women are discriminated against, where poverty dehumanizes, where hypocrisy is second nature to man.

And now, I have fallen victim to this hypocrisy. Those who do not have what we call the "poetic insight" would, naturally, fail to go beyond the word or diction of this poem in question. I am not responsible for their ignorance. They fail to see the authorial intent, the meaning I would have wanted them to see. On the surface, this poem may scandalize the average church-going, Bible-reading individual. Then, I dare say, this same Bible-reading church-goer MUST read the Song of Songs and judge King Solomon by his "lustful" words!

8 Comments:

Blogger Unknown said...

Wow. H just reminded me of the song "Vincent".

It's really absurd- that's the word. Absurd, for people refuse to see beyond the thick viels of their ignorance. Even a professor couldn't break in into skulls that think. (wow!! I like this! Enjoying the freedom of speech the technology offers).

This "Come, Man-child, Come!" poem makes me view sex less "bastos". When we talk about sex, we just think it's all about pornography and clumsy ejaculation. But this poem? (the church should recommend this to ITS members) It made me realize how sacred and meaningful it is. Sex is not merely using a woman. It's being loving, unselfish, and considerate. It's about knowing a woman deeper. It's about respect and honor.

Walk around and your mind will tell you how much sex there is around you. WE DON'T NEED EROTIC POEMS TO MAKE US MORE PERVERTED THAN WE ALREADY ARE. Are you aroused with this poem the second time you read it? I advice that you check your focus; something must be wrong. Now try understanding this poem. I dare say that the next time you have sex with your wife (or husband), it will be more fulfilling and SACRED.

3:49 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

oooppppsss... misspelled the last word in the 3rd sentence. think should be THICK.

3:54 AM  
Blogger kastanyas santissima said...

i erroneously posted my comments for this entry on your previous entry, Poetically Challenged, those on the SOng of SOngs, and on the last few lines of your poem.

5:13 AM  
Blogger H said...

In poetry, Words do not speak for itself in most of the time;they are keys that unlock deeper wonders and for that, every Poets deserve compliments of how they artistically express their views and we ought to respect it. I really feel sad why people are often deceived by what they read on the surface of a poem. It's merely half a point of its true meaning.

8:46 AM  
Blogger H said...

im juh

8:55 AM  
Blogger Vincent Pido said...

agree! i'm sure most of the people who read the poem have seen more "pornographic" things in their life, anyway. it's not like you devirginized them and stole away their precious innocence by writing a poem.

and you didn't even force them to read that poem. good christians (like them)would have altogether stopped reading the poem the moment they realized that it was just a worthless, sinful piece of temptation. but no, they read it until the very last line. what would that say about their values then?

3:01 PM  
Blogger Seriffed said...

the man who said this, whoever he is, is right: education is the ability to listen to anything without losing your temper or your self-confidence.

1:11 AM  
Blogger Eric Eson said...

is the title ars erotica or Come, man-child, come?

12:52 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home