Thursday, June 29, 2006

Of falling leaves and loneliness

l(a leaf falls)oneliness...

"Poetry is the concretization of the abstract... the spontaneous overflow of powerful emotions... the lava of imagination that prevents its own eruption... blah...blah...blah..."

Let the poets -- both living and dead -- define poetry. As for me, poetry is simply a liberating force.

Poetry imbues me with the power not only to manipulate words, but also to create them. Poetry doesn't confine me within the bounds of standard vocabulary or prescribed grammar. It gives me the freedom to see what I want to see in a moss-covered stone, in mouth-watering plums or in a falling leaf. I don't have to give a hoot about what critics (with Ph.D. in literature) have to say about a poem; I am the critic, I am the poet.

They say that when a poem has been written down, the poet dies. S/he dies a "poetic" death, so to say. S/he no longer owns the poem. S/he is simply the source of the words on paper, which, in and by themselves, are nothing more than the printed words. It is the reader who makes sense of that seemingly nonsense, meaningless, silly doodles of random thoughts.

I'm a big fan of the Fantastic Three: William Carlos Williams, E.E. Cummings, and Walt Whitman -- three unconventional American poets. I like them not because they wrote outstanding poems. The fact is, some critics find them rather "unartistic" and their poems, "pollutants" in the orderly and musical world of fine-sounding poetry. I like them because they're stalwarts and mavericks. I like them because they're rebels with a poetic cause; because they dared to be different, to follow the road less traveled.

Their poetry doesn't have to rhyme or to sound musical to be "heard." Their poetry doesn't have to sound artificial and contrived just to be categorized as literary as the sonnet or ballad or ode. They are simply... poetic.

And, one other thing about poets: it is believed that most of them led a lonely life. The price of being different? The consequence of not being understood by average minds?

Perhaps , e.e. cummings has something to say on that, lying hidden in his poem about a falling leaf and loneliness.



[NOTE to ENG 5W STUDENTS OF MS. H: What thoughts do you have about the art of poetry? Who are your favorite poets? What do you like about their poetry?]

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

This Is Just to Say

Idaresay

"So," I started, "what do you think of this poem by William Carlos Williams?"
"Is that a poem," blurted a homo sapien in black shirt.
"Yes, Einstein. It 'sounds' like a poem, so it must be a poem!" blurted Marie Curie.
"But it just looks like a note posted on the fridge by some insensitive swine who loves plums!" said the Neanderthal man in row three.
"People, this is poetry. Heller! As in 'ambiguous' bala! Hidden meaning! Heller," reacted a member of the Federation.
"Liza Minelli is right,class," said I. "Welcome to the world of poetry, where nothing is what it seems."
"Miss, this William...Carlos...Whatever, what is his point? I just can't dig him."
"Oh, you poor thing, you! You haven't even encountered e.e. cummings yet. Anyway, what is your reading of this silly-looking stuff:

I have eaten
the plums

that were in
the icebox

and which
you were probably
saving
for breakfast.

Forgive me
They were delicious

so sweet
and so cold." ?

"Reading, Miss? What d'ya mean 'reading'?" asked Einstein again.
"The meaning of a poem is not in the text; it's not in the poem, Einstein. The meaning is in YOU. What does this poem mean to you?"
"Poem? What poem?"

[NOTICE TO THE ENG 5W, ENG 1A, and ENG 105 STUDENTS OF MISS H: If you have something SENSIBLE to say about the poem above, please post you comment herein. If, like Einstein here, who doesn't manifest any brain activity, you can't come up with a cerebral evaluation of W.C. William's poem, JUST please go read some comic books.]

Sunday, June 18, 2006

Idaresay

Idaresay

Ok. So, I had a trip to Slumberville and forgot about my blog. But that doesn't mean I have nothing left to say.

There is this reality show called Cheaters on Reality TV (if don't have cable or sattelite TV, you can stop reading this and spend your precious time on more worthwhile undertakings), which tickles my fancy. It's about men and women "playing fire" behind their "supposedly faithful" lover. So what else is new in the game of love? Watch it and tell me what you think of it... that is, if you're in my writing or world lit. class.